Lillian Maltese
10/5/2015 12:18:37 pm
(Lillian Maltese, pd. 8)
Reply
Hasmin Llamoca
10/11/2015 06:06:07 pm
Hasmin Llamoca
Reply
Gimelyn Yray
10/7/2015 11:52:18 pm
Gimelyn Yray
Reply
Priya Rana
10/11/2015 07:44:44 pm
Good job in writing your blog post, I agree with everything you have written. Your blog post was very informational and well written. . Your writing included all the key facts to the chapter. After reading this I feel you really understand the chapter and are ready for tomorrows test. Your blog post is a perfect summary for this chapter. So good job.
Reply
Paola De La Cruz
10/11/2015 08:33:30 pm
I'd like to congratulate you on your blog post. I believe it was well-written and it is evident that you put much thought into your opinion. I must say that the propaganda during World War I certainly contributed to the tensions among the nations. It is true that the alliance system was also responsible for creating an intense ambiance. The one thing that interested me the most was the use of propaganda. According to the cartoon posters, everyone was able to support the war effort whether it be by eating less food, buying bonds, sewing socks for soldiers etc. I am fascinated by the way that people were easily influenced and encouraged. Their response to the propaganda was expected, seeing as though no one wants to have a bad reputation for not helping in one way or another. The propaganda made it seem as if one was helping the enemy if he or she wasn't doing anything to support one's own nation by asking questions like "On which side of the window are YOU?" Once again, great job, Gimelyn!
Reply
Kayla Oakley
10/10/2015 12:49:04 pm
(Kayla Oakley, pd. 8)
Reply
Joshua Tolentino
10/11/2015 12:31:02 am
Joshua Tolentino
Reply
10/11/2015 09:01:16 pm
Gimelyn Yray
Reply
Joanis Pellumbi
10/13/2015 02:09:05 am
Josh the one thing that stood out in your post was the citation and I give you a big thumbs up for that. I really liked the topic you chose because it was the same topic that interested me. It is really fascinating how technology advanced from muskets to machine guns, tanks, posionous gas, U Boats etc in a short period of 100-150 years. I liked how h divided the weapons between air, ground, and under water and keeping them organized. I also liked how you fully described the weapons and how they worked too. Overall it was a great job well done.
Reply
Caroline Nowak
10/13/2015 09:02:26 am
Great job on your blog! I learned so much about the technology used during war time. Some things I had never even known. The advancements in technology definitely made a difference in the war.
Reply
Priya Rana
10/11/2015 12:49:53 pm
The Paris Peace Conference (page 604)
Reply
Joshua Tolentino
10/11/2015 10:29:56 pm
Joshua Tolentino
Reply
Lillian Maltese
10/12/2015 01:08:37 am
Priya's insight into the mind of Woodrow Wilson was a great observation and definitely sets up many topics that can be brought up or debated upon. She was able to show how Wilson wanted the central powers to compensate for the destruction brought on by the war and how much they had to pay. At the time, Wilson would've been seen a hero and fighting for America. Yet, to think about it, $56 billion is quite a lot of money for people who just invested into a war and lost. This is especially true when regarding the fact that this is much different than the inflated $56 billion from today's standards. After a quick calculation, I found out that the amount owed is $1.35 trillion today! Another interesting idea is that Germany was seen as a potential economic crisis country not only after WWI but also WWII. The debt that they owed eventually would be lowered or brought to nothing after the country showed its importance. Now, Germany is seen as a big help in economic bailouts, especially to Greece with their economic crisis. Germany has come a long way from the days of WWI.
Reply
Nicolette Maggiore (Period 9)
10/11/2015 02:16:54 pm
Organizing the Economy for War (Page 596)
Reply
Dave Pascual (Period 8)
10/11/2015 04:25:44 pm
Wow Nicolette that is very interesting piece of information to find to which upon I can agree with. Even though the Americans weren’t present since the beginning, the Americans still managed to spend around thirty-two billion for the war. Because the Americans were drowning in the debt, they came up with clever ways to raise money to subside the expenses. The government came up the idea of Liberty Bonds, which earned them around twenty-three billion and raising taxes which eventually raised them ten billion. These clever ways organized and helped the United States financially. However, what I found during my studies of this chapter was that their economy fell apart again by the end of the war. Inflation of prices skyrocketed during the turn of the war. Everything was in supply of demand and was at least fifteen percent more expensive. Could you even imagine that? That is insane! Millions jobs were lost (Around five million). Not only jobs were lost but also even properties were taken. Around half a million farmers’ lands were taken away. You wouldn’t want to imagine what was going through these American’s minds. If only the government had a clever way to resolve these problems like what they did with their war debt.
Reply
Gimelyn Yray Period 8
10/11/2015 09:22:19 pm
Gimelyn Yray
Reply
Sarah Del Donna (Pd.9)
10/11/2015 11:03:39 pm
Nicolette, the information you have provided really shows how much the war can economically affect a country. Even though America was not present the entire war, they still managed to spend billions of dollars participating in it. Also, choosing to partake in the war efforts will later result in problems, both financial and emotional, that will be extremely difficult to recover from.
Reply
Evan Geisler (pd.9)
10/12/2015 02:48:02 pm
Wow Nicolette! It seems you have really understood this chapter and I have found this very interesting.The piece i liked the most was that by 1920, the bonds had brought in $23 billion.Also, new taxes were imposed on the public that brought in $10 billion. That is a lot of money!
Reply
Rachel
10/12/2015 11:36:12 pm
Nicolette, you did a great job on understanding how the war affected the economy. Even though the US wasn't there for the beginning of the war, they still put billions of dollars into it. Money was being lost in every second of this war and it was very hard to bounce back from.
Reply
Daniela Cavallaro
10/11/2015 02:32:54 pm
(Daniela Cavallaro, pd. 8)
Reply
Bryan Williams PD 8
10/11/2015 03:22:19 pm
Trench Warfare was a very violent method of war. The typical trench was dug around twelve feet deep into the ground. There was often an embankment at the top of the trench and a barbed wire fence. Some trenches were reinforced with wood beams or sandbags. The bottom of the trench was usually covered with wooden boards called duckboards. The duckboards were meant to keep the soldiers' feet above the water that would collect at the bottom of the trench. The trenches weren't dug in one long straight line, but were built as more of a system of trenches. They were dug in a zigzag pattern and there were many levels of trenches along the lines with paths dug so soldiers could travel between the levels. Soldiers generally rotated through three stages of the front. They would spend some time in the front line trenches, some time in the support trenches, and some time resting. They almost always had some sort of job to do whether it was repairing the trenches, guard duty, moving supplies, undergoing inspections, or cleaning their weapons. There were all sorts of pests living in the trenches including rats, lice, and frogs.
Reply
Kayla Oakley
10/11/2015 04:40:33 pm
Kayla Oakley (Pd. 8)
Caroline Nowak
10/13/2015 09:04:58 am
Good job on your blog Bryan! I did mine also on Trench Warfare! I thought it was a really interesting topic because that strategy is still used today. Your blog had different information than mine and I did learn some different things from it. Some of our information could compare because it was similar but some was different it' helps to get a different insight on a topic.
Bryan Williams
10/11/2015 03:18:31 pm
Overall, after learning about this war it's fascinating to see how much Russia was influenced and changed. In 1914, World War I began and Russia was at war with Germany. A huge Russian army was formed by forcing working class and peasant men to join. Although the Russian army had great numbers, the soldiers were not equipped or trained to fight. Many of them were sent into battle without shoes, food, and even weapons. Over the next three years, nearly 2 million Russian soldiers were killed in battle and nearly another 5 million were wounded. The Russian people blamed the czar for entering the war and getting so many of their young men killed. The people of Russia first revolted in early 1917. The revolution began when a number of workers decided to strike. Many of these workers got together during the strike to discuss politics. They began to riot. The Czar, Nicholas II, ordered the army to suppress the riot. However, many of the soldiers refused to fire on the Russian people and the army began to mutiny against the Czar. After a few days of riots, the army turned against the Czar. The Czar was forced to give up his throne and a new government took over. The government was run by two political parties: the Petrograd Soviet (representing the workers and soldiers) and the Provisional Government (the traditional government without the Czar). In October of 1917, Lenin took full control of the government in what is called the Bolshevik Revolution. Russia was now the first communist country in the world and this caused Russia to leave WWI.
Reply
Jonah Balagtas
10/11/2015 10:55:59 pm
I really find this topic very interesting. It's sad how the Czar sent soldiers in without the basic supplies required to do their job. According to this post and many other sources, the Czar seemed very dim and unintelligent. What surprised me is how he ordered his soldiers to fire on their fellow countrymen. I understand why his people would revolt against him. Even after the revolt, though, Russia was still having problems. A couple years later, Russia became the first communist nation under Lenin. This is a huge piece of history that would affect Russia for decades. It still affects the country now even after the downfall of the communist government.
Reply
Rafael Guinto
10/12/2015 04:16:26 pm
I applaud you on your blog about the Russian government during World War 1. It is interesting to see how Russia was having external problems with other countries, but they also have internal conflicts within their government. Sending troops into a war without proper supplies and/or training is disgusting. Sending young men into battle with no weapons is just atrocious. They are putting their lives on their line to fight for their country with no weapons. It surprises me how people in power do not think for the lives of their people. I am glad that Czar Nicholas II was run off the throne before any more lives are wasted at the expense of his foolish leadership.
Reply
Aliyah George
10/14/2015 08:33:15 pm
I find it interesting that you chose to focus on Russia during World War I being that they weren't a huge part of the war. I agree with the fact that it was fascinating to see how much Russia was influenced and changed ,but also feel as if their part in the war was very minimal and was the least influential.
Reply
Dave Pascual
10/11/2015 03:34:35 pm
The Paris Peace Conference was held to discuss international affairs, but what I seemed to find was that many Americans back home didn't even acknowledge what was going on in Paris simply because of post war recession. The country was filled with stress the day after the armistice was signed. They felt that the fighting ended sooner that it was planned originally. The country went into mass restoration. Inflation soon took over the country because of high in demand for consumer goods, which resulted in the country to abandon their wartime prices. For about two years, consumer goods increased on average fifteen percent each year. That’s a whopping thirty percent. That’s like a ten dollar shirt being worth eighteen dollars for the same shirt within two years due to supply in demand. You can’t even imagine what its like during that time period. Businesses were being bankrupted. About five million American’s jobs were lost, and about half a million farmers’ lands were taken. Five million! That’s a lot of people. Americans who did have jobs were at also at stake because they worried about job security. They could be instantly be replaced by the next guy on the waiting line. This was a very stressful time for Americans.
Reply
Daniela Cavallaro
10/11/2015 05:19:15 pm
(Daniela Cavallaro, pd. 8)
Reply
Lillian Maltese
10/12/2015 01:16:43 am
Dave was able to make a clear and concise point about something that is not often talked about in history classes which is the aftermath that was left in America during and after the war. A problem that men face during this time, but not as extreme as World War II is that soldiers had a tough time getting a job when they came back because their position in the company was most likely taken. Businesses were shutting down because of the resources for many things weren't available because the government needed resources to fuel the war. Everyday Americans faced hardships and were emotionally taxed after the war and left no slack for Americans to pick back up and resume their lives. Instead, they could only be faced with more problems that were soon to come such as more bank crises and extreme consumer inflation that did not parallel wage inflation.
Reply
Hasmin Llamoca
10/11/2015 05:08:14 pm
Hasmin Llamoca
Reply
Joshua Tolentino
10/11/2015 09:56:52 pm
Joshua Tolentino
Reply
Daniela Cavallaro
10/11/2015 05:13:48 pm
(Daniela Cavallaro, pd. 8)
Reply
Paola De La Cruz
10/11/2015 08:05:55 pm
Paola De La Cruz
Reply
Sarah Del Donna
10/11/2015 10:52:22 pm
I agree with you Paola! To an extent, it becomes apparent that the United States have become to involved with problems that don't concern them. Of course, the country must keep tabs on foreign countries to protect themselves; however, I feel as if they are being overprotective.
Reply
Evan Geisler (pd.9)
10/12/2015 02:52:20 pm
Wow Paola! Reading this made me understand that you really understood this part of the chapter. I agree with you just like Sarah did.The part i found interseting was that the Platt Amendment was later nullified in 1934 with F. D. R.'s Good Neighbor Policy. I really enjoyed reading this article.
Reply
Vandan Patel (period 8)
10/11/2015 10:41:31 pm
The first World War was full of death and destruction. The many countries involved had a huge part in the war and its origins. The war was blamed mostly on Germany but in reality many other countries that were involved were also at fault. The main reasons for the war could be classified into four main categories. One of those categories is militarism. The European countries of pre-World War 1 had rapidly increased their military power. This led to another category, nationalism. This meant that the different ethnic groups in Europe had increased pride. Another category that causes the Great War is the vast imperialism of all the countries that want to increase their power around the globe. Great Britain, France, Italy, Russia, and Germany had various colonies outside of continental Europe. The last and final catergory was the many alliances made between the main powers in Europe. There were two sides in Europe. The Triple Alliance consisting of Germany, Italy, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The second was the Triple Entente which consisted of Great Britain, France, and Russia. The spark that finally blew it all open was the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand of the Austro-Hungarian empire. The assassin was a rebel that was a part of a group that wanted independence from the Empire. They were from Serbia so the empire declared war on Serbia. Since Serbia was a good friend of Russia, Russia declared war on the empire. Then since the empire was in an alliance with Germany, Germany then declared war on Russia. From there all hell broke loose. In the end, the winners blamed Germany since they were the most involved.
Reply
Jonah Balagtas
10/11/2015 10:48:57 pm
I agree with you on the statement that World War 1 was full of death and destruction. It was a brutal and expensive war. I found your post very interesting in the fact that WW1 was the effect of many unfortunate events piling up on one another. Nationalism, Imperialism, and militarization are only some of the reasons why this war happened. It's also really sad that Germany was blamed for everything when, in reality, all of the European countries were responsible. Sadly, this blame acted as the fuel for the second World War which would plague Europe with bloodshed once again.
Reply
Samantha Nazario
10/12/2015 08:16:24 pm
I entirely agree with your concept on how brutal the war was. The casualty count was over 38 million people with 17 million deaths and 20 million wounded. I also agree on how Germany wasn't entirely at fault and the blame shouldn't have been entirely set upon their shoulders. After all each and every country is to blame for jumping in on this. However, in the end it seemed everyone wanted a taste of the action but no one wanted the blame. Sadly this won't be the first time Germany is blamed for a war, seeing as in World War 2 they are a major causation.
Reply
Sarah Del Donna (Pd. 9)
10/11/2015 10:47:20 pm
After learning about WWI, the efforts to get people involved were apparent. Propaganda posters were targeted to specific groups of people to convince them to see the benefits of participating in the war efforts. Commercial advertising was used to create an image to make the war seem glamorous and something everyone should be a part of. Therefore, people felt obligated, pressured to partake in the war efforts. Also, anybody was able to help because even the slightest bit would truly be beneficial. Even children and the elderly qualified as contenders in the bloody war. The posters were also used to show the country's point of view on the war by depicting their enemies as the "bad guy" in the cartoons. All in all, the number of participants in WWI had greatly increased after the creation of these convincing illustrations.
Reply
Nicolette Maggiore
10/11/2015 11:01:44 pm
Sarah, I agree with your statement on propaganda influencing people to join the war. I would like to add the fact that negative propaganda was also created at this time. Some of these illustrations had the exact opposite affect on the people of America. Some turned away when they saw the blood battle illustrations because they were frightened. However, there is always some good with the bad and vice versa. I notice that in this situation. Overall- nice job on your post! It was very clear to understand.
Reply
Dahana Rene'
10/12/2015 11:50:14 pm
I agree to this statement for the propaganda during WW1 was majorly done for recruiting soldiers for war. bonds were enforced and the image of stating which side are you on when it came to the bright realistic view of war or in the dark unaware of what going on. These recruiting propaganda effects made it surreal a fact that any who were in high school and or or young or volunteering state that once you turn 18 you had to come to war for the country of the US counted on them. so many who joined were not fit for battle, because many did have little, or no experience.
Reply
Swati
10/13/2015 02:06:09 pm
Jonah Balagtas
10/11/2015 11:08:37 pm
Jonah Balagtas
Reply
Evan Geisler (pd.9)
10/12/2015 02:57:39 pm
Weapons and technology used in WW1.
Reply
MaryAngel
10/12/2015 09:08:18 pm
Evan, I agree with your paragraph. The technology in world war 1 was useful as well as deadly. The gases killed instantly and without any effort. It was an easy killing tactic.
Reply
John Zecca
10/12/2015 11:56:14 pm
Evan, I also agree with your ideas stated. World War I was the birth of chemical warfare. It allowed for massive damage to be dealt from a distance with relative safety. Over the course of the war all sides adopted this method of warfare because of its effectiveness as you stated. The gases would kill victims almost immediately and readily.
Reply
Rafael Guinto
10/12/2015 04:08:35 pm
Rafael Guinto
Reply
Samantha Nazario
10/12/2015 08:04:38 pm
Mr. Tuttle
Reply
Dahana Rene'
10/12/2015 11:41:41 pm
This i strongly believe is the real reason that the U.S entered WW1. for if this proposal did not upset the US intervening in foreign relations wouldn't have occurred. nicely written by the way.
Reply
Swati Patel
10/13/2015 02:13:57 pm
I agree with both of you, Sam and Dahana, the Zimmerman telegram was an internal diplomatic communication issued from the German Foreign Office in January, 1917 that proposed a military alliance between Germany and Mexico in the event of the United States entering World War I against Germany.
Reply
MaryAngel Cruz
10/12/2015 08:44:09 pm
War in Europe in 1914 with Germany and Austria-Hungary fighting Britain, France, Italy, and Russia affected U.S. interests from the start. The British and the German navies both interfered with American shipping, but German submarine attacks were deadly. Almost 130 Americans died when a submarine sank the British ocean liner Lusitania in 1915. President Woodrow Wilson demanded an end to the attacks, and they stopped for a while, but by 1917 they kept going. The United States declared war.
Reply
Matthew Fernandes
10/12/2015 09:56:28 pm
The onset of new new technology in the early 1900's gave way to new battle styles and techniques during world war 1. These technologies range from equipment used under the sea to flying airborne vehicles. These vehicles changed the way battle was conducted. These changes gave rise also to trench warfare.
Reply
John Zecca
10/12/2015 11:35:39 pm
Women in World War I
Reply
Dahana Rene' Period 9/ 12 October 2015
10/12/2015 11:37:43 pm
The Assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was an immediate spark for hostiles which occurred in Europe 1914. Being that this act was a start to revolutionizing rivalries upon the "Triple Entente" and the "Triple Alliance." The Triple Entente included this allied forces of Great Britain, France, and Russia. The Triple Alliance insisted of Italy, Germany and Austria-Hungary. These two opposing sides declared war upon another and the fact that America who was not involved in this matter heard news and wanted nothing of foreign relation, all changed due Germany declaring a Submarine warfare and the sort of the Zimmerman Telegram, which included a proposal of Southwest America to Mexico. so ideally the main reason why WWI happen were because of MAIN(Militarism,Alliances,Imperialism,Nationalism)
Reply
Swati Patel Period 9
10/13/2015 06:45:10 pm
Dahana just to I agree on what you have to say just to add more Ferdinanad was the archduke of Austria who was assassinated in 1914 by a Serbian terrorist, Gavrilo Princp. This was the starting point of WWI. His assassination was the start of World War 1.
Reply
Rachel
10/13/2015 12:00:00 am
The new technology and weapons that were made for the war, were complex and deadly. In this time, airplanes were shot down by artillery from the ground with riffles and pistols. Other planes, used machine guns to take down planes. Germany used bomber planes to drop bombs below on cities, destroying them completely. Tanks were used to cross trenches; tanks were unstoppable against German soldiers. On the other hand, while at sea, submarines attacked ships from underwater using torpedoes. From this, underwater listening devices were developed. Warships during the war became much more faster and powerful.
Reply
Aliyah George
10/14/2015 08:29:02 pm
APUSH Period 9
Reply
Joanis Pellumbi
10/13/2015 01:49:54 am
Joanis Pellumbi
Reply
Davidson Rene
10/13/2015 10:02:40 am
Davison Rene
Reply
Caroline Nowak
10/13/2015 09:00:35 am
History remembers trench warfare as wasteful, futile, and uninspired, but in reality it was a deeply thought-out system that underwent constant revision. Here's how it worked during World War I. It was around this time 100 years ago that the mobile battlefield along the Western Front ground to a screeching halt a 440 mile stretch that barely moved in the ensuing four years.
Reply
Rosalia orlansk
10/13/2015 12:36:31 pm
A new era in warfare was born on the battlefields during 1915. German troops launched a chlorine gas attack in the first ever large-scale use of chemical weapons. It was only one of the innovations seen during World War I, and not all of them were as deadly.All sides were looking for a way to break through enemy lines at the time and they spent billions on the search. The result was an advance in technology. Researchers invented mobile radio telephones, engineers constructed cannons capable of firing shells and fighter planes were flown into battle zones for the first time ever.
Reply
Swati Patel
10/13/2015 02:10:21 pm
Swati Patel
Reply
Aliyah George
10/14/2015 08:22:21 pm
APUSH Period 9
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
OUR BLOGThis is a place to discuss class readings, discussions, and books that have something - anything- to do with topics we cover in class. CategoriesArchives
July 2017
Categories |
|